Table of Contents
Is Babri case in international court?
Mejbel Al Sharika has insisted to draw the Babri Masjid Case into the International Court. In 2019, the Supreme Court of India delivered the judgement on the Ayodhya Case; after almost 19 years of dispute. However, the decision did not make the Muslim majority Countries very happy.
What court said about Babri Masjid?
Summary of the verdict The Court ruled that the 2010 Allahabad High Court’s decision, division of the disputed land was incorrect. The Court ruled that the Demolition of the Babri Masjid and the 1949 desecration of the Babri Masjid was in violation of law.
Is Babri Masjid was built on Temple?
R. Nath has stated that, judging from the architecture of the mosque, it should be taken to have been built in the pre-Mughal period. Apart from Hindus, Jains and Buddhists have also claimed the site. According to Jain Samata Vahini, the mosque was built over a 6th-century Jain temple.
Has Babri Masjid been demolished?
The demolition of the Babri Masjid was illegally carried out on 6 December 1992 by a large group of activists of the Vishva Hindu Parishad and allied organisations….
| Demolition of the Babri Masjid | |
|---|---|
| 19th century photo of Babri Masjid | |
| Ayodhya Ayodhya (India) | |
| Location | Ayodhya, India |
| Date | 6 December 1992 |
Who has not been accused in the Babri Masjid demolition case?
On 30 September 2020, the court acquitted all the 32 accused including L. K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, Vinay Katiyar and several others in the case on account of inconclusive evidence. The special court judge said, “The demolition was not pre-planned.”
Who are the five judges in Ayodhya case?
A group photo of the five-judge bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi (C) flanked by (L-R) Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde, Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice S Abdul Nazeer after they delivered the verdict on Ayodhya land case. Photo: PTI
Why did Supreme Court invoke Article 142 in Ayodhya case?
The Supreme Court, implicitly referring to the demolition of the Babri Masjid at the disputed site, said that it was invoking Article 142 “to ensure that a wrong committed must be remedied”.
What will happen to the disputed land in Ayodhya?
Possession of disputed 2.77 acre land will remain with Central government receiver. The Muslims will get alternate five acres of land either in the surplus 67 acres acquired in and around the disputed structure by the central government or any other “prominent” place. A trust will be formed in 3 months to build a temple on the disputed land.
Why did the Supreme Court decide to handover the Ayodhya site to Hindus?
It is an interesting coincidence that one key component of rationale the apex court’s judgment uses to handover the site entirely to the Hindu litigants is that splitting the disputed site, over which the Muslims admittedly had a solid legal claim, could disturb public order, peace and tranquility.