Table of Contents
Many Social Darwinists embraced laissez-faire capitalism and racism. They believed that government should not interfere in the “survival of the fittest” by helping the poor, and promoted the idea that some races are biologically superior to others.
With Social Darwinism gaining popularity, inequality gained a strong foothold in the society driven by concepts of eugenics and racism. Around the 1900s, sizable populations around the world believed that the quality of human race should be improved by privileging the best human specimens (including themselves).
What did social Darwinists believe?
The social Darwinists—notably Spencer and Walter Bagehot in England and William Graham Sumner in the United States—believed that the process of natural selection acting on variations in the population would result in the survival of the best competitors and in continuing improvement in the population.
One example is from the book American History. This book by Alan Brinkley states Social Darwinsim as “a harsh theory that argued that individuals who failed did so because of their own weakness and ‘unfitness'” (528). The Nazis Social Darwinism applies to race while the capitalists belief is economic productivity.
In general, the concept of Social Darwinism has many pros such as “breeding” out weakness and disease, supporting the strong, and encouraging the development of a more advanced society. It also as many disadvantages, however, such as a smaller gene pool, hindering the weak, and controlling who gets to have children.
How did Social Darwinism change the world?
Darwinism allowed us to gain a better understanding of our world, which in turn allowed us to change the way that we think. By being able to apply this to other animals, it changed the way that people thought about life on earth and opened new doors for science in the future.
Herbert Spencer is famous for his doctrine of social Darwinism, which asserted that the principles of evolution, including natural selection, apply to human societies, social classes, and individuals as well as to biological species developing over geologic time.
Did Social Darwinism help the poor?
Poverty would always exist, Spencer concluded, because the stronger members of society would triumph over the weaker members. Social Darwinism provided wealthy and powerful people with a justification for their existence.