Why was The Hobbit not as good as The Lord of the Rings?

Why was The Hobbit not as good as The Lord of the Rings?

The Hobbit trilogy felt like a retread of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, because that’s exactly what it was. The Hobbit falls into the pitfalls of the prequel by focusing too much on the past and not enough on telling its own stories. As the original, The Lord of the Rings didn’t have any of those problems.

Why was the Hobbit movies so bad?

The development of the movie stalled due to major financial issues with MGM. They were close to a disaster… The bloated Hobbit movies, which, like The Lord of the Rings, were all shot at the same time, didn’t receive such planning.

READ ALSO:   Do dogs pee less when in heat?

Is The Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings?

There are two ways to analyze them: as standalone films and as adaptations of other works. As films, the Lord of the Rings easily beats out the Hobbit. As adaptations, the Hobbit movies just barely edge out the LotR movies.

Was The Hobbit trilogy a success?

But whether or not the film makes it over the hump, the Hobbit trilogy has been incredibly successful on a domestic and worldwide stage. The three-film trilogy cost around $765m to produce and made $2.916b worldwide thus far.

Was The Hobbit before Lord of the Rings?

In the new film there are many nods or foreshadowing to adventures or characters seen in LOTR, and connections to be made. The Hobbit takes place 60 years before the Lord of the Rings adventure, save for the new film’s prologue, which unfolds about twenty minutes before The Fellowship of the Ring begins.

READ ALSO:   Is Shayera Hol a reincarnation?

Can you watch The Hobbit without seeing LotR?

The Hobbit is a trilogy, not a single movie and this is also the case with the LotR. The latter was made first but the former takes places earlier chronologically. However, watching the Hobbit trilogy is not “required” to enjoy or understand the LotR trilogy.

Is The Hobbit before Lord of the Rings?

How many The Hobbit movies are there?

Original director, Guillermo del Toro, intended to split The Hobbit into two movies, but Jackson added a third after taking over, turning a single, modestly-sized novel into 3 lengthy movies. As one might expect, this made each installment of The Hobbit feel bloated and meandering compared to The Lord of the Rings.

Are the Hobbit prequels better than the original Lord of the Rings?

The truth is, there’s a major difference between the quality of The Hobbit prequel trilogy and the original Lord of the Rings movies. Every surprising detail that went into making The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King was meticulously thought-out, planned for, and weighted in Tolkien-lore and film history.

READ ALSO:   What are the role of ICT in education in curriculum innovation?

How many Lord of the Rings movies will there be?

When Peter Jackson was developing his original Lord of the Rings trilogy, he intended to cram the entire story into just two films, fearing that no studio would dare take a punt on three.

Was Peter Jackson’s ‘The Hobbit’ trilogy the greatest of all time?

Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy still stands to this day as one of the greatest cinematic feats of all time. The Hobbit trilogy, Jackson’s attempt to catch lightning in a bottle a second time, was less successful.