Table of Contents
What concept does post hoc, ergo propter hoc deal with?
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: ‘after this, therefore because of this’) is an informal fallacy that states: “Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X.” It is often shortened simply to post hoc fallacy.
What is post hoc fallacy in social scientific explanations?
Post hoc (a shortened form of post hoc, ergo propter hoc) is a logical fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier.
What type of false connection is made in the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy?
1. FAULTY CAUSE AND EFFECT (post hoc, ergo propter hoc). This fallacy falsely assumes that one event causes another. Often a reader will mistake a time connection for a cause-effect connection.
What is another name for post hoc fallacy?
false cause fallacy
Post hoc fallacy, or false cause fallacy, is an argument that draws the conclusion that one event is directly caused by another event without evidence to prove this. The conclusion suggests a cause and effect relationship between two events, or one event or thing causing a specific effect.
What does post hoc ergo propter hoc translate to?
Latin. after this, therefore because of it: a formula designating an error in logic that accepts as a cause something that merely occurred earlier in time.
How do you avoid post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy?
As noted above, the key to avoiding the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy in your work is to base your arguments on evidence as much as possible.
What are some examples of post hoc ergo propter hoc?
The Latin phrase “post hoc ergo propter hoc” means “after this, therefore because of this.” The fallacy is generally referred to by the shorter phrase, “post hoc.” Examples: “Every time that rooster crows, the sun comes up. That rooster must be very powerful and important!”
What does post hack ergo propter hack mean?
What is either or fallacy?
a type of informal fallacy or persuasive technique in which an argument is constructed so as to imply the necessity of choosing one of only two alternatives. This ignores the possibility that (a) the alternatives may not be mutually exclusive and (b) there may be other equally viable alternatives.