Would of had or would have had?
When people write would of, should of, could of, will of or might of, they are usually confusing the verb have with the preposition of. So would of is would have, could of is could have, should of is should have, will of is will have, and might of is might have: I would of come earlier, but I got stuck at work.
What tense is had had?
“Had had” is the past perfect tense of “have.” You use the past perfect tense when you need to indicate that something occurred before another previous event.
Can we use had with would?
Originally Answered: Which is correct: would have or would had? Would have; would’ve. “I would have done it” is correct; “I would had done it” is incorrect. Now, let’s mix it up: “I would have had it done” is the correct phrasing; “I would had done it” isn’t correct phrasing in this situation.
Is it correct to say ‘had had’ in this sentence?
The usage of ‘had had’ is grammatically correct, and it conforms to the rules of Past Perfect Tense appropriately. The syntax for any Past Perfect Tense sentence is “had + [past participle form of verb]”.
How to use ‘had had’ and ‘had wanted’ in the past perfect?
There’s no special magic with “had had”, they don’t really go together as a pair anymore than “had wanted” go together. So don’t worry so much about how to use “had had” as a unit of grammar, they will come together naturally when you want to express the verb ‘to have’ in the past perfect.
When do you use have had in the present perfect?
We use have had in the present perfect when the main verb is also “have”: I’m not feeling well. I have had a headache all day. She has had three children in the past five years.
Can “have” and “possess” be used in the same sentence?
Both these meanings can occur in the same sentence. You conjugate the tenses of “to have,” meaning “to possess,” like this: In cases where you’re using the past perfect tense to describe possession. “Have” has two almost-unrelated meanings in everyday English.