Can companies use GPL software?
Software under the GPL may be run for all purposes, including commercial purposes and even as a tool for creating proprietary software, such as when using GPL-licensed compilers. Users or companies who distribute GPL-licensed works (e.g. software), may charge a fee for copies or give them free of charge.
Can I run GPLv3 software on an iOS device?
This question is specifically about GPLv3, LGPLv3, and Apple’s App Store for iOS devices. Given the additional restrictions Apple imposes on iOS users (i.e. not allowing them to modify and run GPLv3 software or LGPLv3-licensed portions of software without additional conditions or at all), and/or
Does Apple infringe on the rights of (L)GPL software authors?
Apple can indeed set whatever rules it wants, but they can’t infringe on the rights of (L)GPL software authors by redistributing their software without complying with the terms of the license. This question aims to clarify a few issues regarding Apple’s legal standing as a licensee of (L)GPL software.
Does Apple have a right to distribute GPLv2 software?
If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. Which led to the suggestion that Apple had no right to distribute GPLv2 software, and the discussions that arose and are documented in the question, supra.
Can the recipient ignore GPLv3 S7 restrictions on redistribution?
Apple’s standard restrictions are placed on it afterwards; thus the recipient, by GPLv3 s7, may simply ignore them. An exception may arise when the software is uploaded to Apple by a rightsholder; then an argument can be made that the rightsholder, knowing that Apple will place these conditions on redistribution, has consented to them.