Table of Contents
Which lens is good for Canon 90D?
The Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Nano is the best overall lens for the 90D. Versatile, fast enough for most shooting situations, and fairly compact to make it easy to keep attached to your medium sized DSLR, the Canon 90D camera body, and keep it there!
Is Tamron 18-400mm full frame?
Focal Length Range. Tamron calls it an ultra-telephoto all-in-one zoom lens. A wider-than-18mm (28.8 full frame AOV) focal length will often be utilized by landscape/cityscape photographers and also by those photographing interiors.
Is the Canon 90D good for macro photography?
Paired with the right lens, your 90D has plenty of resolution to capture fine detail with macro and general close up photography. This photo was taken at ISO 400, f/9.0 at 1/200 second. The Canon 90D is versatile for a wide variety of photos.
What is the Tamron 16-300mm lens?
The Tamron 16-300mm is a wide-angle telephoto lens designed for DSLR cameras with the APS-C sensor. It offers premium features like a 35mm focal range of 24-450mm, Vibration Compensation for combating blur, 39cm minimum focus distance, Piezo Drive motor, and more.
Is the 18-400mm lens better than the 16-300mm?
Especially @300mm the 16-300mm lens VC does a much better job IMO. The chromatic abbreviation seems to be less in the 18-400mm, even much less than my 16-300mm, while I get the feeling spherical abbreviation is a bit worse on it.
Is the Tamron 18-400mm worth it?
On specs alone, the Tamron is superior to the Sigma. That extra 2mm is noticeable, and great if you shoot a lot of interiors or landscapes. If telephoto is more your thing, the 18-400mm F/3.5-6.3 DI-II VC HLD is a remarkable zoom range and pretty much as good are you’re going to find in an DSLR lens.
What are the downsides of the Canon EOS 16-300mm lens?
The downsides for both lenses are the same as the Sigma. That f/6.3 is going to really restrict you in lower light situations. You’ll almost certainly need to use a tripod or crank the ISO. Also, I found that the pictures I got weren’t quite as good with the 16-300mm as I got with the Sigma. So more tradeoffs for versatility.