Table of Contents
Can Pakistan take Kashmir issue to ICJ?
“Kashmir issue cannot be taken to the ICJ because Pakistan and India have not signed any agreement in this regard,” law minister Farogh Naseem said. The law minister clarified that a single party cannot take a matter to the ICJ. “Both parties need to agree.
Is India signatory of ICJ?
Among the matters over which India does not accept ICJ jurisdiction are: “disputes with the government of any State which is or has been a Member of the Commonwealth of Nations”, and “disputes relating to or connected with facts or situations of hostilities, armed conflicts, individual or collective actions taken in …
Can the ICJ prosecute individuals?
The principle of complementarity means that the Court will only prosecute an individual if states are unwilling or unable to prosecute. Therefore, if legitimate national investigations or proceedings into crimes have taken place or are ongoing, the Court will not initiate proceedings.
Who was the lawyer of kulbhushan Jadhav?
During Tuesday’s hearing, the attorney general Khalid Jawed Khan showed the court correspondence between Pakistan and India for providing counsel to Mr Jadhav in order to comply with the verdict in the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Are ICJ Judgement binding?
The judgment is final, binding on the parties to a case and without appeal (at the most it may be subject to interpretation or, upon the discovery of a new fact, revision).
What is the case of Jadhav v Pakistan?
Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan) – The Court finds that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in the matter of the detention and trial of an Indian national, Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, has acted in breach of the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
When will the Jadhav case judgement be delivered?
Pakistan) – The Court to deliver its Judgment on Wednesday 17 July 2019 at 3 p.m. Jadhav case (India v.
Did Pakistan violate Article 36 of the Vienna Convention?
Next, the Court examined India’s claim that Pakistan had acted in violation of its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, by failing to inform India, without delay, of Mr. Jadhav’s detention.
What is the background of India’s Vienna Convention case?
In its Judgment of 17 July 2019, the Court first outlined the background of the dispute, before concluding that it had jurisdiction to entertain India’s claims based on alleged violations of the Vienna Convention.