Table of Contents
- 1 Under what circumstances is rebellion against a government justified?
- 2 Is an armed rebellion against government authority?
- 3 How do Jefferson’s Unalieerable rights compared with natural rights expressed by Locke?
- 4 What is a rebellion against the government?
- 5 Is there a constitutional right to overthrow the government?
- 6 When is armed rebellion against a government justified?
- 7 Is armed rebellion morally OK?
Under what circumstances is rebellion against a government justified?
Rebellion is justified when it balances the individual rights and the common good of a situation, without injuring or causing negative results on the cause.
What was the main cause of the rebellions?
First there are grievances (complaints). These grievances have usually been ignored over so long a period of time that people have become impatient with the slow pace of change; they begin to feel that conditions are unbearable. These grievances are underlying causes, or the most important causes of rebellion.
An armed but limited rebellion is an insurrection, and if the established government does not recognize the rebels as belligerents then they are insurgents and the revolt is an insurgency.
Is rebellion always justified?
Historically, rebellion is justified when the population of a given political entity (for example, a nation-state) feels it has no recourse for the redress of grievances other than a revolt against that political entity. Rebellion is justified when there is no other recourse but to raise arms against a government.
How do Jefferson’s Unalieerable rights compared with natural rights expressed by Locke?
How do Jefferson’s “unalienable rights” compare with the “natural rights” expressed by Locke? Jefferson talked about life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness, and Locke talked about life, liberty, and freedom. It is okay to rebel when someone is destructive against life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Was the rebellion of 1837 successful?
However, it too was poorly organized and was quickly put down. It was followed by further looting and devastation in the countryside. The two uprisings left 325 people dead, all of them rebels except for 27 British soldiers. Nearly 100 rebels were captured.
What is a rebellion against the government?
A rebellion is an attempt to overthrow a government—an organized revolution. It can also refer to a revolt against another form of authority. More generally, rebellion can refer to an action or behavior that resists or defies rules or norms or otherwise challenges the status quo.
What is it called when people go against the government?
Full Definition of anarchist 1 : a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power. 2 : a person who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order.
Is there a constitutional right to overthrow the government?
–That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on …
Does the US Constitution have the right to revolution?
The right of revolution is not a right that is defined and protected by the Constitution but a natural right. However, it would not have been absurd for the preamble to the Constitution to have acknowledged the right of revolution, as, for example, the preamble to the pennsylvania constitution of 1776 had done.
When is armed rebellion against a government justified?
One interesting question within political theory is the question of when armed rebellion against a government is justified. Most people that tackle this subject try to find some set of moral lines that a government must cross before it becomes illegitimate and thus armed rebellion becomes morally OK.
Is rebelrebellion justified?
Rebellion is justified when there is no other recourse but to raise arms against a government. A functioning democracy, therefore, is generally considered immune from any such enterprise directed against it.
Is armed rebellion morally OK?
Most people that tackle this subject try to find some set of moral lines that a government must cross before it becomes illegitimate and thus armed rebellion becomes morally OK. Being an anarchist I take a different tack.
Are there always rebels who are against governments?
Usually , there are always rebels who are against governments. In an autocratic system of the government where the dictators rule the country, the rebellions are usually violent as there are not many ways to make their voices heard. In a democratic system, the rebels of the government are the opposition parties of the parliament.