Table of Contents
- 1 What is the major problem with the Milgram study?
- 2 What were participants deceived about in Milgram’s obedience experiments?
- 3 What did we learn from Milgram experiment?
- 4 Is deception Good or bad?
- 5 What are the ethical issues of the Milgram experiment?
- 6 What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
What is the major problem with the Milgram study?
what is a major problem with the original Milgram study? Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical. The field of social psychology studies topics at the intrapersonal level.
What were participants deceived about in Milgram’s obedience experiments?
In all of Milgram’s obedience experiments, participants were deceived about: *the amount of shock the victim actually received.
How is the Milgram study relevant today?
Summary: A replication of one of the most widely known obedience studies, the Stanley Milgram experiment, shows that even today, people are still willing to harm others in pursuit of obeying authority. While no shocks were actually delivered in any of the experiments, the participants believed them to be real.
What were the consequences of the Milgram experiment?
Milgram’s research has had profound implications for the study of individual behavior that results in harm to others, demonstrated by events like the Holocaust and the My Lai massacre, showing that obedience to authority figures stems from the construction of a situation or context of authority, within which various …
What did we learn from Milgram experiment?
The Milgram experiment, and the replications and related experiments that followed it, showed that contrary to expectations, most people will obey an order given by an authority figure to harm someone, even if they feel that it’s wrong, and even if they want to stop.
Is deception Good or bad?
While lying to oneself is generally perceived as harmful, some experts argue that certain kinds of self-deception—like believing one can accomplish a difficult goal even if evidence exists to the contrary—can have a positive effect on overall well-being.
What does the Milgram experiment tell us about human nature?
Milgram summarized his findings: Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. The experiment has been repeated many times, by Milgram and others, with similar results.
Why is authority bias bad?
But you will be less likely to be influenced by this cognitive bias if you’re aware of it. Remember, authority figures can make poor decisions just as well as anyone else–and in these cases, if you follow a mistake without second guessing it, it can lead to poor outcomes that negatively impact you.
What are the ethical issues of the Milgram experiment?
ETHICAL PROBLEMS There are 3 main ethical issues with the Milgram experiment: deception, protection of participants, and right to withdrawal. Milgram argued that the prompts were justified because the study was about obedience and orders were necessary.
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
One major problem with the original milgram study is: Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical. During his obedience experiment, milgram falsified his data in order to change the narrative of his research’s results, which make his research pretty much unreliable.
What are the implications of the Milgram experiment?
Milgram’s Experiment and its Implications for Human Behaviour Obedience to Authority. What Milgram found was that the level of blind obedience to authority depended on situational cues and the context, and in designing his experiment within that context The Milgram Paradigm and Replication Studies. Implications of the Study. Implications for Human Behavior
What did the Milgram experiment teach us?
The Milgram experiment The Milgram experiment came about by a Yale University psychologist by the name of Stanley Milgram. The experiment was to test how well the study participants were and the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with what they thought was right.