Table of Contents
What is the section of 307?
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code. (a) A shoots at Z with intention to kill him, under such circumstances that, if death ensued. A would be guilty of murder. A is liable to punishment under this section.
What is ipc310?
Section 310 in The Indian Penal Code. 310. Thug. —Whoever, at any time after the passing of this Act, shall have been habitually associated with any other or others for the purpose of committing robbery or child-stealing by means of or accompanied with murder, is a thug.
Is IPC 306 cognizable offense?
Punishment for Abetment of Suicide under Section 306 IPC Offence under Section 306 IPC is cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable, and triable by Court of Sessions.
Can bail be granted in 306 IPC?
The Court observed that the grant or denial of bail is entirely the discretion of the judge considering a case but even so, the exercise of judicial discretion has been circumscribed by a large number of decisions rendered by the Supreme Court and by every High Court in the country.
What is Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code?
Section 309 in The Indian Penal Code 309. Attempt to commit suicide.—Whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence, shall he punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year 1 [or with fine, or with both].
Should Section 309 of the IPC be removed?
Recently, the law commission has recommended for removal of S. 309 from IPC. A bill has been i Section 309 of the IPC criminalise attempted suicide. If a person has attempt to suicide, then the section seeks to penalise the act of that person.
What will happen if Section 309 is repealed?
If 309 is repealed, there will be no provision to take action against those who intend to create trouble of this sort. Section 309 IPC can be redefined in such a manner where it can still be leveraged in law and order situations, and not be used against those who are suffering from genuine mental health issues.
Is Section 309 a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution?
In the Gian Kaur Case in 1996, a five judge bench of the Supreme Court of India had ruled that the section 309 was not violative of article 21 of the constitution of India. The law commission of India had also recommended removal of the section from the statute. A bill in this regard was introduced in the parliament, but was not made into law.